T O P

THE NEXT TWO WEEKS

THE NEXT TWO WEEKS

TheJdmGod101

Its removed


thet-shirtguy

Here we go with more "shiny objects..." Sorry, the system isn't going to allow us to win. It's so corrupt that there isn't a single entity, SEC, DOJ, FBI, Congress, DTCC, CFTC, OCC, or what the fuck ever acronym, it doesn't fucking matter. They are all covering for each other and will continue to do so in perpetuity.


Icy-Paleontologist97

Whether you intend it or not, your sentiment is FUD. You make it sound like our efforts are futile. Well, I must respectfully disagree. We are winning. There’s a ton of evidence, some included in my post, to suggest that. But most of all, GME is not a penny stock and we aren’t going down to $40 again. And if the SEC is meeting about enforcement 2x in 96 hours, you can bet something is on the move. Take heart, ape. The only ones sweating bullets here are the shorts.


thet-shirtguy

Look, I am not trying to spread FUD, and I hope you are right. However, what story will it be next time? Not trying to be a dick, but ffs, isn't it clear that NO ONE in ant corrupt gov agency is going to do a mother fucking thing? They're not. FFS, they just allowed OCC rule changes to fuck retail over again. And THAT'S FUCKING MIDSTREAM IN THE GAME.... How the fuck is that not being called out? JFC!


Icy-Paleontologist97

That OCC rule change is not to fuck over retail. It’s to prevent the collapse of the entire market. We don’t want pension funds to collapse, right? That’s what it is for.


dbx99

The stock market would see red if the hedgies have to liquidate (sell off) their holdings to buy up the shorted stock to close their positions. Those sell offs will cause stocks in any account including pension funds to lose value.


Icy-Paleontologist97

Lose value is one thing. Sink to the bottom of u/rick_of_spades tunnel of mystery is quite another.


PrinceHabibo2

The OCC rule-post that got so popular was unintentional FUD and the OP of that post and also alot of the commenters misinterpreted the rule. There should be some counter-posts to the FUD-post somewhere on Superstonk. Like this posts OP said (summary): The purpose of the rule is to not collapse the entire market when SHFs & Co have to liquidate. I understand your anger. But this anger is unnecessary because the whole thing is misunderstood. We're going to win no matter what. Time is on our side.


BigBradWolf77

guess we will just have to buy, hoald and register harder...


thet-shirtguy

I am planning on registering harder tonight... as soon as apette gets home.


BigBradWolf77

this is the way


Wofue

I mean he’s kinda right


ObserveTheGreyArea

I completely understand your sentiment. This corruption goes all the way to the top. It's hard to see how we could win when all the cards are stacked against us. I'm still skeptical, tbh. How long before they put a new rule in place to limit what we can sell our shares for "for our protection"? Or use this news of a "solar storm that's going to knock out the internet" to say they've lost track of all digital shares owned and owed, so they can just write off all the naked shorts and "compensate" retail investors by giving us our initial investment back to avoid paying out? I think they'll try to figure out the amount they can pay out to satisfy most, so that only a small percentage will try to start a revolution against their corruption, and that small percentage can be ignored and blasted by the media as rioters again. And you just know they'll plant a few of their own people in the crowd to cause destruction so they can use that as a reflection of our movement. I know this is sounding very tin-foil, but realising how far the corruption and manipulation goes, and how long its gone on for, is it really too far of a stretch to think that this is exactly what they'd do?