Daily Community Chat Megathread
By - AutoModerator
I hope my new neighbor is under 40 and cool
I hope I have a downvoting stalker.
Is there a podcast I could listen to with basically the same content debated in this sub?
No such thing
If you wanna listen to the pure blue pill liberal position listen to justbreakup podcast. If you want to listen to the pure red pill position fresh and fit.
Just amalgamate the two
The problem with most podcasts is that true opposing opinions are quite rare. While most of this sub is quite red/black, there are still opposing views and actual debates going on.
I love how the women here are pro studies when it makes them look like angels
It's stupid to be "pro-studies". It's important to know how to understand and critique them as part of their usefulness in any debate.
You linked to a comment by a man
Read through your replies to him
What about it?
Make a point/argument here.
>no, women are NOT only attracted to Chad/a tiny portion of men. They are not attracted to YOU.
This was your reply to a guy showing you a study
You didnt even read his study and you just called him an incel
Where did I call him an incel. Point it out for us.
You guys do understand most people here can read English right?
>no, women are NOT only attracted to Chad/a tiny portion of men. They are not attracted to YOU.
Women don’t get horny looking at pictures of men they way men get horny looking at pictures of women. Common knowledge. For anyone being genuine and not looking for fodder to feel sorry for themselves and pretend they’re “average.”
Most normal people understand female sexuality works differently than male sexuality. Except on PPD.
And how does this prove his assertion that women only care about studies that make them look like angels?
Read through my history
Nah read through her history
Cmv: people who are:
- overly religious and/or sexually repressed
- anti freedom/democracy
- obsessed with telling other people what they should be doing with their genitals, free time, [face and hair, apparently,](https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/pec64i/public_life_would_be_better_without_makeup/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf) careers, marriages, etc
- obsessed with analyzing the dating lives of others instead of actually doing any dating themselves
Should just opt out of trying to date in the west. Spare yourselves (and us) the frustration and turmoil.
..... Do you not understand what the point of the sub is?
Before it became a haven for shut in incels and sexual jihadsjts it was a place to debate pill concepts in the framework of real world application.
It's a debate sub. Things like morality and social good are classic debate topics. Real world application is irrelevant to a debate sub. We aren't trying to change the world here.
We ARE talking about dating and sex. And if you’ve never done either and you’re only here to whine about whose fault it is, that’s was not the intent of this sub. What’s irrelevant is the constant thought policing by those who’ve never experienced dating and sex attacking people who have because the real world doesn’t line up with their incel beliefs.
But you don't know who has and hasn't dated or had sex. And if they say something that doesn't correspond to reality it should be simple to refute them
>you’re only here to whine about whose fault it is, that’s was not the intent of this sub.
Also no, like I said , this is classic debate stuff.You do these things for every topic that's debated.
We know because they either self identify or it’s extremely obvious (when a guy says shit like a man has to have a huge dick to hit all the spots of a vagina, it’s pretty fucking obvious).
Whining is not debate. I understand whining is the default Communication mode for a lot of men here but that doesn’t make it debate.
Then it should be easy to refute them. If they are whining as you say and they don't have arguments, winning the debate should be easy.
Oh it is. They just respond with butthurt insults. Truth hurts.
I seriously have my doubts.
So uh... is this a way of you telling us you're opting out of dating?
Edit: [History being even more based](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-481882/Condemned-virgins-The-million-women-robbed-war.html)
>two million men die
"These poor virgin women left behind"
I know the bullshittery of feminism shouldn't shock me anymore but hot damn
Why can't we be sad for lonely childless miserable women AND men. Are we not allowed to talk about the consequences of war on women?
Because women have to be the center of attention...
Why can’t women talk about their feelings and loss
It takes nothing away from men
>It takes nothing away from men
They continually use it to silence men, and to push male issues out of the lime light. Women must be the bigger victims, and any discussion that might swing the pendulum, even ever so slightly to the male side of the equation, is attacked.
Also time and again feminists use these sorts of cherry picked stories to justify their inane antics. Try to explain how historically it wasn't peachy for both genders is, of course, summarily attacked by women.
We’re not allowed to talk about women on this sub outside of the context of them being hypergamous whores?
Why do you think it's an average?
I doubt you’ve ever even met a “western woman”
Nope. I see a dude trying to make himself feel better about the fact that “western women” routinely reject him.
Oh so then you actually date the women with 50+ counts?
So you want us to believe you don’t date or try to date them but spend your time obsessing over what they’re doing with their vaginas?
50 hookups in 4 years :(
why are women this way
Because of the male demand and little offer from women.
>why are women this way
Because there are plenty of men who are also engaging in casual sex?
>Because there are plenty of men who are also engaging in casual sex?
Actually its a few men engaging in a LOT of casual sex. If it was most men engaging in all the casual sex I think men as a whole would be a lot happier.
>b b b bUt wHaT aBoUt MeN?!
I'm not female, and I'm not gay, so I don't care about other men.
>It's why stds are so common with women
Women get STDs easier because vaginas are pockets for bacteria, it's not because of how much sex they have
A woman’s anatomy can place her at a unique risk for
STD infection, compared to a man.
\-The lining of the vagina is thinner and more delicate than
the skin on a penis, so it’s easier for bacteria and viruses
to penetrate the vagina
\- The vagina is a good environment (moist) for bacteria
Yes, [I'm sure the CDC](https://www.cdc.gov/std/health-disparities/stds-women-042011.pdf) is wrong about female anatomy. Glad you're here to correct them
I'd like to point out the 5-7% swipe rates.
I’m currently 21, dating market and female friend market for me is 18-22yo college girls.
50 is semi-rare, not because of the frequency of hookups, but because of the 5 year stretch where she was unable to secure a relationship.
Most of the girls I know acquire sexual partners 1 dude per anywhere from 2weeks-2months. Their casual sex campaign usually gets ended by a guy committing to a relationship/situationship for an extended period of time.
Something about that girl is terrible. Luck, her type, her behavior, or her dating technique. But either way, 5 years single while aggressively dating is a 🚩. She will be fine though. Just tell the next guy she only has 6.
Just ignore those types if you aren’t into it and you come across them. If you’re a quality man, you’ll be the one choosing.
None of you have met a Western woman, have you? Do ANY of you live in the West?
Pretty sure this is a “non western” (eh-em) dude who wants “western women” (white) and can’t have them so he’s trying to show that the grapes were sour anyway
Mildly racist, but ok.
No they don't
Women on PPD: most women don't like casual sex. It's too risky and doesn't feel good. Cock carousel is a delusional fabrication.
Also women on PPD: 50 casual encounters ain't nothing do you even live in the same country I do
I forgive you though
I'm saying the EXACT OPPOSITE, normal women in the west are NOT having ex with 50 randos off Tinder
>I forgive you though
Damn this might make me very naive, but I didn't realise Kanye was a SUPERSTAR like this. I feel like there's a different level of excitement and reverance for this new release.
I guess I'll listen
It’s shit. Kanye is officially overhyped imo.
- OP makes a yes/no thread
- You answer yes
- Mods arrive and decide that OP's thread qualifies as CMV
- Mods remove your post because it agrees with OP which is not allowed in CMV threads
PPD, PPD never changes
Oh no, mod politely asked you to copy/paste your comment to another section. The absolute horror...
No one asked me anything, I just got "automod, please"-d
Yes, that is politely asking you move your comment to the automod. I said please and everything...
That is annoying, yes
It’s crazy how much sun damage ages people. I saw a friend today who’s only 31 and she already has a ton of fine lines and the start of crepey facial skin because she spends all her time outdoors without protection. Meanwhile my other friend who turned 36 recently still has the same smooth skin of her early 20s.
They’re both pale UMC white people so it’s not an ethnicity or class advantage thing either.
Pussy money weed.
That’s all folks
Tinder is so freaking lame this is what I have to [put up with](https://imgur.com/a/Tz5y9yE) my bio is basically an autobiography and I basically tell exactly what to say to me.
So much hey I feel like a freaking horse. What app features women capable of conversation?
>So much hey I feel like a freaking horse. What app features women capable of conversation?
Tbf men are just as bad.
When I was on dating sites, the vast majority of messages I got were "hey" or "hey babe / hun". And most of their bios were txt talk.
I mean it's not their job to do the monkey dance?
Women think it's men's job to do the monkey dance. It is true that life as a woman in the dating world is fucking tutorial mode.
Well who is more desperate to get laid again? Like, we're literally talking about tinder here lmao. I'm surprised they even said hi. You can "but muh abundance mentality" all you want but it's still same in the end of the day
Also, it's \*life as an attractive woman
> Well who is more desperate to get laid again? Like, we're literally talking about tinder here lmao.
Women act like that everywhere though. Females in every species on Earth do this shit. It's women, not men. Male thirst only makes it worse but it's definitely a female trait to be this ludicrously self entitled.
>Females in every species on Earth do this shit.
What shit, not throwing themselves at males cos the latter just neeeeeeeeeeed to get their peepee wet? Is that entitlement?
If men aren't treated as disposable then women are automatically oppressed, eh?
Not throwing yourself at a man = treating him as disposable? Good to know
No one is talking about women throwing herself at a man. That is biologically impossible for a woman to do. We're talking about all the monkey dancing men have to do to attract a woman. Why are you trying to twist this discussion?
How exactly is that treating men as disposable? I really want to understand, and btw I'm not talking about intentionally wasting someone's time here. We're talking about the early stages of what might or might not develop into a relationship. Should women just go ahead and take the initiative with literally every dude who crosses their path and shows minimal signs of interest just because he wouldn't mind a casual fuck?
You ever listen in when women talk to other women? When's the last time you heard any that wasn't just gossip, passive aggressive backhanded comments, meaningless platitudes, or insincere compliments?
What kind of women are you around? I think the last time I had to get into some shitty talk with another girl was at school. And she was a bully.
Protip: the last time most of the guys herr have met any woman in real life was in high school
Well, some of them are married and most work.
This post is the biggest chad humblebrag
Chat is luck of the draw.
None at all. If you are extremely attractive they at least try but good conversations are far and inbetween.
Women think men are simple minded.
Threads about women’s body count in big dating subreddits are always fun to read. So many people could not handle the fact that some men actually care about the body count.
Hypocrisy annoys people
I've never heard a concept as stupid as "hypocrisy in dating preferences".
What you want in a partner has nothing to do with what you are yourself.
Otherwise every single woman on the planet is a hypocrite.
Pursuing dating and sex while condemning other people for pursuing dating and sex is hypocritical
Only if your morality is that casual sex is bad for everyone. However that is not to case. People that dislike woman with high ncounts ether have low or 0 n count themselves or believe that high n counts are bad for woman not men.
And finally there is also a large percentage that has nothing to say about it morally. They simply choose to not date woman with high n counts.
It has to do a lot with your morals though. If you think that sleeping around is bad, it's bad for everyone.
People are saying they don't want to date a woman with a high n count. That is their preference.
Also men and woman are different. If women don't mind men with a high n count their is their preference.
Or are you only going to date guys that behave exactly like you and have the exact same personality as you?
I'm explaining to you that if someone avoids partners with high n-count due to moral reasoning, it means they themselves shouldn't have high n-count. Preferences have at least some ground under them.
When I was single, I was looking for someone with similar morals, sure.
That is only if their moral is that everyone should have low n count. If their moral is "high n count is bad for woman" then it's not contradictory nor hypocritical. You might dislike or disagree with that moral stance but its not inherently contradictory.
It's still bad as sleeping around with women they increase women's n-count.
They would only be decreasing her value not his. Selfish yes but not hypocritical. Of course in dating prefferences everyone is selfish.
Ye, imagine there being negative consequences for your lifestyle choices lul. Seems like people in the US haven't quite grasped that concept. Hence, obesity epidemic, unwanted pregnancies everywhere, 98% people have a form of herpes, etc.
try talking about single mothers, I once said something like I wouldnt date one and they got soooooooooooooo mad at me it was hilarious
Sometimes it is funny to see the women freaking out about men actually having some standards. "There must be wrong with these men for having standards".
Welcome to the club buddy
And women are so laughably lacking in self-awareness that they get mad at men when we call them out for their superficial standards.
I'm annoyed about the moderate "reasonable" narrative that people want to date people with similar dating experience.
No, high body count makes a woman unattractive period.
It is like a man's height or confidence. If a shy, short woman can want a tall, confident man because tall and confident men are better than short and shy men, then men no matter their N-count can want low N-count women because lower N-count women are more attractive and better than high N-count women.
Although the posts are funny to see women freaking out men actually having some standards. Welcome to the club buddy
It's more annoying than fun.
I don't see why it should be viewed as any more shallow or less valid than any of their preferences.
I think that's how you know the body counts women report in those studies are fraudulent.
Kevin Samuels does look good in the face for his age but he’s too skinny to be appealing to me
The wall is pretty standard lol. Pointing out a few exceptions does not hide the masses that look they've already started falling off the cliff awhile ago.
There isn’t much room to debate that people of color age better than white people. Those who actually see people of color on a routine basis know this.
>There isn’t much room to debate that people of color age better than white people.
There is, depending on your level of favoritism/bias.
It’s science. Melanin and collagen prevent wrinkles and sun damage.
Everything doesn’t have to be about disingenuous “my people are better than your people” fake news tribalism. Somethings are just true whether you like it or not.
>It’s science. Melanin and collagen prevent wrinkles and sun damage.
Sounds like it's more something that you want to believe than anything. As if having more melanin means "I'll age better than white people" automatically. A lot of the time, y'all just end up looking like different versions of Uncle Ruckus from The Boondocks, though I'm sure your examples for your proof are nothing short of people with celebrity or model status. Ain't nobody talking about Cliff or Jackson.
>Everything doesn’t have to be about disingenuous “my people are better than your people” fake news tribalism. Somethings are just true whether you like it or not.
Right...... lol. Unless it's coming from certain people.
[Melanin protects skin from the sun's ultraviolet rays.](https://medlineplus.gov/ency/anatomyvideos/000125.htm)
[several studies have shown that collagen peptides or supplements containing collagen may help slow the aging of your skin by reducing wrinkles and dryness](https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/collagen-benefits)
[the type of collagen black skin produces is less prone to the sun damage.](https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vice.com/amp/en/article/mgmzva/a-dermatologist-explains-the-science-behind-the-black-dont-crack-stereotype)
7th grade science here brah
If you want to think that the sun is the big bad wolf, then go right ahead, but it's not the end of the argument for black people magically aging better when all other things are considered. The face and body still changes with age and it doesn't make a difference how many wrinkles you've got. You're still going to look older. The only ones who don't typically look older are the ones who have looked younger for most of their life anyway.
I guess a scary movie for you would be one where the sun chases after people and ages them until they die.
>Somethings are true whether you like it or not
Yes, like the fact that you'll still age whether you like it or not. You're not immune from aging simply because your skin is darker.
Um yes, this is obvious to everyone. Something like 80% of aging damage comes from UV rays from the sun, and people of colour have more melanin which blocks these rays before they can go deep and damage the DNA, hence why their looks degrade less with age. Pretty much everyone knows this, it's not like something new.
(Hence why all white people should immediately start wearing sunscreen).
Black people should wear it too when out in the sun for extended periods even though we have natural protection. The sun can even wear down our skin.
Aging is mostly just genetics. Diet plays a factor but isn't the be-all, end-all. If it happens to be correlated that people in poorer countries have worse genes, then that about zaps your argument, doesn't it?
>Aging is very dependent on diet and epigenetics. Poor people have poor diets.
Yes, it's a compounding issue, but aging still is dependent on genetics. We're talking about how someone looks here. It makes no sense to say that someone doesn't look old just because their skin isn't wrinkled or sagging. Someone can still "look 30 at 23" purely because of their genes and it's actually somewhat common.
>Mice on bad diets affect their offspring for up to 11 generations.
I'm guessing those diets were unnatural diets, not just "bad" diets. Also, is there evidence of similar problems among other species or is this specifically a rat problem?
>So your tack is invalid. Aging has multiple factors.
Multiple factors, yes, but not what I think you're talking about. What controls whether someone looks younger or older than they are is mostly genetics, as in their bodily structure. Diet affects everything around that.
I think you're missing the point of the argument. Genetics is what makes someone look who they are. Everything around that is affected by the environment. It's the difference between looking like a young older person, or an old young person. You can have flawless skin at 20 and still look like you're mid-20's because of your face/genetics/traits inherited from your parents. Diet doesn't change the structure of your body at all. Nobody can eat their way to looking like a model unless they had the genes for it already.
Edit: Just accept reality, downvoters.
>Diet definitely ages skin and tissues. It’s called collagen crosslinking
Yes, skin and tissues, like I've been saying. It won't make the wicked witch of the west look like Kim K if they were the same age no matter what she eats.
You look 45
What kind of scumbag actually says this to a person
I don't doubt that Lenny looks good for his age but I don't think it's fair to use a digitally enhanced professionally taken photo as the evidence of that.
Also aside from sunscreen what steps can/should white people be doing to age gracefully or are we genetically fucked in the aging department?
good diet, antioxidants, and not letting your weight fluctuate
most of white people's aging faster is bad sunscreen use and being out side to much. We aint made to be in the sun too much lmao
Some of it could be genetic tho
sure, which is why I said most of, which I still think is true
Wow, just brutal, and this guy is 6'5" too!
[this is what self-described solid 7 looks like](https://i.imgur.com/mN1iMBY.jpeg)
Still winning 🤣
I'm calling cap on the title, I'm a 5 or *maybe* a 6 and 5'7 and have had more success on tinder then that. Dude is probably a 4 given the height
*edit* yeah the dude is fat and has a unibrow, 6-7 my ass lmao
Then he should try to meet women in person. You can’t tell he’s 6’5 from his profile.
I also think he’s a 4-5. Could be a 6 if the woman has the right blinders on. He also doesn’t look 22. I would’ve believed him if he said 30. His pictures are okay for a guy though. I would like to see what he says in his conversations.
He's like a 4. He's fat, balding, etc. Just having one part of the equation ain't shit. You have to have it all.
Height matters a lot but face > height after a certain point.
I'll never be able to get over the whole "doesn't wash his own ass" meme, or why women put up with that (seriously, don't, that's nasty). The only time I failed to do so was when I was so cripplingly depressed I wasn't washing at all (0/5 stars, do not recommend).
Could it really just be homophobic anxiety about touching their own ass? Does the rabbit-hole of homophobia's damage to men go that deep?
I have never dated a man that left “skid marks” on his underwear. I think these women date shitty men and assume their own failure to get properly means all straight men are gross.
So kind of like redpillers and how they tend to frame AWALT.
I think AWALT is more of a defensive thing ie if they assume every woman they see is the same they’re less likely to get oneitis
Of course not all women are like that
Yeah, I'm thinking this is very similar. They've been burned by (literally) shitty dudes and assume men are largely the same to avoid getting falling hard for a guy only to get burned again.
I’m sure a few actually think so, and the rest are just lazy and always had some woman covering their ass, literally
I think they are probably exaggerating.
I dunno, I've known some gross dudes.
Nah, some dudes are just lazy and nasty, I've never heard a guy say "washing your own ass is gay" except maybe as an obvious joke.
At the same time, I've known some extremely gnarly rank dudes still pull, as long as they're hot or manly. Like dealers, dudes in crust punk bands, or lumberjack/oilrig workers.
>dudes in crust punk bands
I mean, that's kind of the subculture; as far as I've seen, the women are no better.
Now I've gotta listen to Amebix.
It’s not real it’s just women coping why chad dumped them and making shit up after the fact. (Women love doing this btw)
Is Milo actually sick, or is this yet another grift?
Probably a grift sadly
I wouldn’t put it past him at all
Did he catch AIDS?
What would you say if he dies by AIDS but his cause of death is marked as COVID?
That would be quite surprising since ivermectin is well-known to cure gay, COVID, liberalism *and* AIDS.
Well they would be similar deaths - much like most AIDS patients died of other causes, so do many COVID cases
Well to be fair...AIDS is pretty much medication controlled at this point in history, unless someone who is hiv positive neglects medication badly then it is fair to see covid as the cause
Same thing, at this point.
Has anyone else noticed that reddit is somehow not blocking comments from people they've blocked anymore? This board is getting unusable having to wade through all the noisy half-retards. It's just not worth the time anymore.