FloatChecker’s response to Yahoo’s float numbers
By - Green-Orange-2366
Fact checking. Good work.
how can there be no consistent data set for the “best market in the world”
what a joke
Yep, great question. It’s by design. How else could billionaires legally fleece average Joes and pension funds?
I’ve reached out to yahoo finance on Twitter and via DMs but they haven’t responded.. color me surprised 😳
Lmayo!! Zero consistency across the board for the float, you’d think it would be straight forward and pretty close. Good find and post, thanks ape! 💎🦍🦍
Yahoo's NAKD reporting is equal to the total outstanding shares, they couldn't even go get the 13Fs to see what was locked....
MSM = shit posting
Nice work here ape. Take a little award for your hard work
I thought I heard in earning call that our total outstanding float is 75.9m?
Anyway, numbers are leaking now. Bullish AF
Outstanding and float are two very different things.
Outstanding is shares issued, float is shares available for trading (outstanding minus insiders and institutions).
So the 75.9m is outstanding
Outstanding - insiders
Institutions are included in the float, it's essentially trades that don't have to be reported to the SEC (unless it's a large percentage of the float).
And minus ETF shares. Etf shares aren't freely traded as they're needed to balance their index.
Aren't ETF shares just bought from the float?
An ETF is a way if buying a bunch of companies at once. So instead of investing in a singular security, you buy shares of the index for a more stable investment.
These shares that are owned in the Index can't be sold until the index rebalances, so they are added to the shares that shorts can't use to close their positions.
A good way to squash this is getting float numbers back from January and seeing if there were anomalies during the sneeze.
Not if the float is doubling because of some fuckery they used to hide FTDs that’s finally stating to pop it’s ugly head up
True, but it'll give us an understanding that it is not a "glitch" and that the anomaly is actually caused due to crime.
We know there is much more crime they are hiding thats just the tip of the iceberg.
It looks like a reporting error from ICE whether its relevant or not is still under scrutiny.
Would this reporting error cause multiple unrelated sources to reflect the same inflated float numbers? This 248M figure is now showing in three separate sites.
Edit: Yahoo finance, Alphadvantage-API, & stockanalysis all showing nearly 250M.shares. Per this post and comments within:
If those 3 are getting the data from the same "tainted" source, yes.
I urge anyone seeing this to check out Gherk's stream. Come for the beauty tips, stay for the salty brine of reality. Both really open up the pores!
Keep us updated with your thoughts amigo. I've seen people talking about switching from the OATS system but I'm honestly in way over my head as many others are to understand the legitimacy of this theory
Thanks for the update!
How is it even legal to have such varying numbers??
Can you contact yahoo, see what they say?
That’s so cool! I didn’t know we had an official Floatchecker! Damn this sub is righteous!
Can you follow up and ask how they plan to obtain accurate short interest?
Mmmmm that crime seems odd 🤔 you can actually find it
[When the walls start crumbling...](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PErUiAyVoGc&ab_channel=JohnMellencampVEVO)
*Shaka, when the walls(t) fell*
*Sokath, his eyes opened*
If they can’t keep it straight on these very visible sites , What could possibly be going on with the delete button inside CeDe &co ?
u were kinder than I was last time I asked them on twitter they responded that i should dm them for further assistance..lmayo
I mean, it's highly complex financial equations that's clearly too difficult for "dumb money" to understand but sometimes "dey make dah boo boos on dah counting thingies."
The real numbers are starting to be exposed