T O P
xBialyOrzel

Not selling our futures to gain short term assets.


King-of-the-idiots69

These aren’t short term tho these guys are all 24 and under they would be part of the future


xBialyOrzel

What do you think its going to take to get people like Boeser and Petterson? I'm not giving up Quinn, Peterka etc.


TheTankWorked

Peterka can be anything! Even Petterson!


King-of-the-idiots69

Boeser is struggling plus the jimbo factor, hoglander wouldn’t cost peterka or Quinn and boeser wouldn’t either


seeldoger47

ur doing that thing were other fans thought they could trade dog shit for Eichel. if you want to get quality you have to give up quality (unless you're trading with a dumbass who will gift you ROR or Buchnevich for nothing).


King-of-the-idiots69

I’ve realized the error of my ways, I cannot believe I strayed like this, I’m *gags almost like a rags fan


xBialyOrzel

Boeser is a near PPG player his entire career, 1 struggling season when the Canucks are absolutely bottom of the barrel isn't lowering his value.


King-of-the-idiots69

I’m going to see what Vancouver fans value boeser at, maybe I’m overestimating the dumbness of jimbo but a panicky jimbo could benefit us I think maybe not for boeser but hoglander could be a target You’re definitely right about boeser but a man can dream, if we can somehow not trade our first Quinn peterka power, we should be looking at hoglander he’s 21-22 years old he fits the timeline, but that’s a pipe dream (Boeser is in a contract year and the RFA winger market has been a buyers market looking at the buch and reino trades as examples)


Unusual-Fig4948

I would make a move for Pettersson if he becomes available. If you have to move on from any prospects (aside from Power) then you absolutely make that move. Sabres fans saying they would be unwilling to include Quinn/Peterka/Krebs in a deal are nuts, it’s the same as when other fanbases said all of their remotely good prospects are not on the table for Eichel. To get good players you need to trade good players. You trade for Pettersson if he becomes available 100%.


King-of-the-idiots69

For petey ya you open things up, he’s an elite center


seeldoger47

yeah, the Sabres don't have a single player I would't make available for Pettersson.


phatsystem

Light up the Dahlin for Pettersson survey again :)


seeldoger47

i can't. i got so much hate for it last time lol


King-of-the-idiots69

I was always in the dahlin for petey camp, I was so surprised to se people so vehemently against it, imagine petey cozens Thomson as our spine its just amazing, getting a better player at the most important position where we have the weakest prospect pool for us an absolute win in my books I love dahlin I think he can still be great but petey can still be an elite center and that’s more valuable than elite d man and we have a guy in the pipeline who can be an elite d man too


seeldoger47

fans bases’ always overrate the young player/prospect relative to other teams’.


King-of-the-idiots69

Ya, It’s because we see the most of them and in general have lots of optimism regarding prospects even tho 90% of the time they never pan out. If we had to trade peterka to get petey, anyone who says no would be absolutely insane


sarcastic_man_13

Who would we even trade? Dahlin is the only player I'd part with that can get us a good return.


xBialyOrzel

The only person I'm trading Dahlin for is Eklund.


King-of-the-idiots69

Only eklund? There’s a couple more prospects I might trade him for


sarcastic_man_13

Eklund is the only prospect I would trade Dahlin for, at least that I can think of, but I would easily trade Dahlin for a package that included Boeser and Hoglinder.


phatsystem

As others pointed out, it's not likely to just run away with a crazy good deal. But, there are probably 3 ways a trade happens for guys like these. 1 and 2 are for younger prospects, and 3 would be a 1 for 1 deal to change up some chemistry 1. Trade some 1st round picks for these guys. Could you get a Boeser for a 2022 and 2023 1st? Maybe. Is that the right call? Pettersson would cost even more. 2. Trade some younger prospects. Same trade for Boeser, but for Krebs and Johnson? Maybe a deal like that (plug in the guys you like) works for them as it's a reset to a younger squad. 3. A 1-for-1 trade. As much as everyone crapped on u/seeldoger47 for his survey, a Pettersson for Dahlin trade could happen IMO. Not saying it's likely, but it seems plausible. A change of scenery type move for both. I think of all the options, a 1-for-1 seems best because we still need qualume (quality + volume) of prospects to be a great team (see Eichel years for further details) and I'd hate to give up a bunch of kids for 1 player as that would work against having numerous potential prospects. But maybe switching up two potential top players gives both teams something more of what they want.


King-of-the-idiots69

This is more what I was thinking of, especially petey dahlin that piques my interest and something for hoglander too


futuretotheback

You must be new to hockey. No sabres literally have no one to trade and we should not give up draft picks. So trust the adams process but its gonna be a bit.


King-of-the-idiots69

I’m not saying we go after Miller I’ve been against goalie trades I don’t want it trade assets you can look through my comment history, the people Vancouver I’m interested in are 24 and under they would be part of the future and the rebuild


futuretotheback

Again im not sure you understand hockey or trading in general? If you want boeser or hoglander who are young and still in their prime you need to trade a similarly valued piece in return. Not trading cozens or dahlin for anybody on vancouver. We have to stick to the process and draft and develop.


King-of-the-idiots69

I’m banking on jet black Jim being dumb, it’s more of a pipe dream thing, hoglander definitely wouldn’t cost as much as boeser I feel like we could make our with a value trade in there, pipe dream obviously, but I’m not willing to part with peterka or Quinn So that knocks boeser out most likely


futuretotheback

The only gm dumb enough to do something like that is no longer employed on the oilers (chiarelli). So not gonna happen.


King-of-the-idiots69

I thought you were gonna say stanbo lmao, chia is in St. Louis atm so he’s technically employed


Professional-Ad-2753

If he was an RFA next season I would’ve said offer sheet him. But we can’t afford to lose a 2023 draft pick with Michkov and Bedard. And I wouldn’t want to give up Peterka or Quinn or Krebs for him. I would say we don’t make a move for him. We need goaltending, our scoring has been pretty solid


King-of-the-idiots69

Maybe hoglander then? There’s only a few players I’d want to trade for rn that I think would be a good idea, I’d rather us keep our assets but Vancouver is a situation to monitor imo, just want to start some discussion on a situation I think could have potential, not saying we should but keep an eye on it


BARDLER

I don't think they would be interested in trading any of their players under 24. They don't need to blow the team up.


King-of-the-idiots69

Ya the only things there shopping aren’t fits in Buffalo